首页> 外文OA文献 >Expression of CD11c and EMR2 on neutrophils:Potential diagnostic biomarkers for sepsis and systemic inflammation
【2h】

Expression of CD11c and EMR2 on neutrophils:Potential diagnostic biomarkers for sepsis and systemic inflammation

机译:CD11c和EMR2在中性粒细胞上的表达:败血症和全身性炎症的潜在诊断生物标志物

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is a need for cellular biomarkers to differentiate patients with sepsis from those with the non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). In this double-blind study we determined whether the expression of known (CD11a/b/c, CD62L) and putative adhesion molecules (CD64, CD97 and EMR2) on blood neutrophils could serve as useful biomarkers of infection and of non-infectious SIRS in critically ill patients. We studied 103 patients with SIRS, 80 of whom had sepsis and 50 healthy normal subjects using flow cytometry to phenotypically characterise neutrophils in whole blood samples. Patients with SIRS had an increased prevalence of neutrophils expressing CD11c, CD64 and EMR2 in comparison with healthy subjects (p<0.001) but a normal expression of CD11a, CD11b, CD62L and CD97. An increase in the percentage of neutrophils bearing CD11c was associated with sepsis, EMR2 with SIRS and CD64 with sepsis and SIRS. Neutrophils expressing CD11c had the highest sensitivity (81%) and specificity (80%) for the detection of sepsis and there was an association between the percentage of neutrophils expressing EMR2 and the extent of organ failure (p<0.05). Contrary to other reports we did not observe an abnormal expression of CD11b or CD62L on neutrophils from patients with SIRS and suggest that this discrepancy is due to differences in cell processing protocols. We propose that blood neutrophils expressing CD11c and EMR2 be considered as potential biomarkers for sepsis and SIRS respectively.
机译:需要细胞生物标记物以将败血症患者与患有非感染性系统性炎症反应综合征(SIRS)的患者区分开。在这项双盲研究中,我们确定了血液中性粒细胞上已知的(CD11a / b / c,CD62L)和假定的粘附分子(CD64,CD97和EMR2)的表达是否可以用作感染和非感染性SIRS的有用生物标志物危重病人。我们使用流式细胞术研究了103名SIRS患者,其中80名患有败血症和50名健康正常受试者,通过表型表征全血样本中的中性粒细胞。与健康受试者相比,SIRS患者的中性粒细胞表达CD11c,CD64和EMR2的患病率升高(p <0.001),但CD11a,CD11b,CD62L和CD97的表达正常。带有CD11c的中性粒细胞百分比的增加与败血症,与ERS的EMR2和与败血症和SIRS的CD64有关。表达CD11c的中性粒细胞对败血症的检测具有最高的敏感性(81%)和特异性(80%),并且表达EMR2的中性粒细胞的百分比与器官衰竭程度之间存在关联(p <0.05)。与其他报道相反,我们没有在SIRS患者的嗜中性粒细胞中观察到CD11b或CD62L的异常表达,并表明这种差异是由于细胞加工方案的差异所致。我们建议将表达CD11c和EMR2的血液中性粒细胞分别视为败血症和SIRS的潜在生物标志物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号